OUP user menu

What Do We Mean by “Older Adults' Persistent Pain Self-management”? A Concept Analysis

Carrie Stewart BSc, Pat Schofield PhD, RGN, Alison M. Elliott PhD, Nicola Torrance PhD, RGN, Suzanne Leveille PhD, RN
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/pme.12251 214-224 First published online: 1 February 2014


Background No standard definition exists for the concept “persistent pain self-management” or how it should be defined in relation to older adults. Poorly defined concepts can result in misunderstandings in the clinical setting and can hinder research through difficulties identifying or measuring the concept.

Objective To ascertain attributes, referents, antecedents, and consequences of the concept older adults' persistent pain self-management and develop a theoretical definition.

Design Rodgers evolutionary model of concept analysis was used to systematically analyze articles from the academic and grey literature (N = 45). Data were extracted using standardized extraction forms and analyzed using thematic analysis.

Findings This concept was discussed in three ways: as an intervention, in reference to everyday behaviors, and as an outcome. Five defining attributes were identified: multidimensional process, personal development, active individuals, symptom response, and symptom control. Patients' perceived need and ability to manage pain with support from others is necessary for pain self-management to occur. Numerous physical, psychological, and social health consequences were identified. A theoretical definition is discussed.

Conclusions Our findings have clarified existing use and understanding regarding the concept of older adults' persistent pain self-management. We have identified three areas for future development: refinement of the attributes of this concept within the context of older adults, an exploration of how providers can overcome difficulties supporting older adults' persistent pain self-management, and a clarification of the overall theoretical framework of older adults' persistent pain self-management.

  • Aged
  • Pain
  • Chronic Pain
  • Pain Management
  • Self-Management
  • Concepts
  • Concept Development


Persistent, or chronic, pain is a complex physical and psychological phenomenon lasting longer than 3 months, which may not have an identifiable cause [1]. It affects up to 50% of community-dwelling older adults, up to 80% of nursing home residents [2] and unrelieved can lead to many debilitating consequences [3–6]. While acute, temporary, pain, focuses on treating the cause of pain [7], persistent pain, an ongoing and often incurable condition, requires greater involvement of older adults to manage pain on a daily basis [7]. Active patient involvement (self-management) can enhance the management of persistent pain [8,9] and is promoted within clinical guidelines [3]. Although many older adults engage in various pain management approaches, they often report these approaches to be ineffective [10]. Additionally, older adults' lack of knowledge about pain and its management, and poor relationships with care providers can prevent some older adults engaging in persistent pain self-management (PPSM) [11]. The high prevalence and suboptimal treatment of persistent pain among older adults highlight the sizeable problem of managing later life pain.

Numerous interventions to increase older adults' engagement in PPSM have been developed but vary in their design, delivery, and outcomes [12,13], suggesting that PPSM may be interpreted in different ways. With no standard definition for PPSM, some authors have developed their own definitions such as “to enhance function, improve mood, and decrease pain intensity by changing the emotional, cognitive, and behavioural responses to pain” [14]. However, these definitions can be ambiguous; what do we mean by emotional, cognitive, and behavioral responses, and how does this relate to older adults?

Little consideration has been given as to whether PPSM means different things for younger (vs older) adults. Yet, we know that the perceptions and consequences of persistent pain differ between younger and older adults. Older adults are more likely to adopt a position of stoicism toward pain [15]. The erroneous belief that pain is inevitable in later life is prevalent among older adults [16] and may deter older adults from seeking help [11]. Additionally, the life context in which older adults experience pain differs from that of younger adults and typically involves retirement, bereavement, changes in function, and isolation [5]. Older adults also have an additional burden from multiple age-related diseases and conditions, which complicate the management of pain [5]. Older adults have a greater risk of developing depression [17] and physical impairment [18] than younger adults with pain. Reduced cognitive function is not uncommon in later life, making understanding and remembering pain management advice more difficult [19]. The uniqueness of older adults' pain experiences suggests that the use of a general population definition for PPSM may be insufficient, or even inappropriate, for older adults.

Older adults' PPSM can be considered a concept. Concepts represent an abstraction of a phenomenon that help us organize and understand our environment [20–22]. They allow researchers to examine scientific theories by providing a means of identifying and measuring theory components [23,24]. Clear concepts also permit efficient communication, facilitating shared understanding between individuals [22]. However, patients often misunderstand medical concepts [25]. This has been partly attributed to differences in vocabulary between patients and professionals [26]. These misunderstandings impede patients' knowledge and clarity about their illness, preventing implementation of chronic illness advice [27] and illustrating the importance of establishing a shared understanding.

Concept analysis involves analyzing current definitions and uses of the concept [15–18], integrating its characteristics [22,28] and clarifying its meaning [21]. It allows a definition to be proposed, which reflects current understandings and identifies areas requiring further clarification [21]. It differs from other review methods in that it aims to answer questions about a concept [29] rather than questions of process or outcome [30]. Although different approaches to analyzing concepts are available, their differences are subtle and they all involve reviewing the literature, identifying attributes (characteristics) of the concept, and developing a definition [31]. The literature review should involve a broad range of relevant disciplines [32] and include grey literature if appropriate [21] to provide breadth of perspectives. Explicit definitions can be rare, which leaves the researcher to seek implied understandings [21]. Implied meanings can be obtained by extracting data that represent how the concept has been used, its theoretical context, its functions, and the actions it involve [21]. Extracted data, both explicit definitions and implicit findings, are reviewed for emerging themes and then organized and reorganized until a clear list of descriptors is produced [21]. These descriptors then become the framework for the proposed definition [21].

This study aimed to develop a theoretical definition for older adults PPSM built upon common attributes (characteristics), referents (contextual information), antecedents (events prior to concept occurring), consequences (what happens after a concept occurs), surrogate concepts (terms meaning the same as PPSM), related concepts (concepts that have a relationship with PPSM), and any age-relevant aspects unique to older adults.


Concept Analysis Model

Rodgers evolutionary model of concept analysis, which asserts that concepts evolve over time, was followed [21]. The evolutionary model is inductionist and considers contextual uses, disciplinary perspectives, and evolutionary changes. Its resulting definition provides a starting point; it does not seek an essentialist definition but aims to illustrate the concepts' approximate parameters and identify limitations and gaps in knowledge [21].


Literature searches were conducted using OVID Medline, EMBASE, EBM Reviews, CINAHL, AMED, and PsychInfo databases. No date restrictions were set for consideration of changes over time. Subject key words and database subject headings were used, including “pain” or “arthritis” combined with “self management,” “self care,” “patient education,” “self help,” and “coping” (a full-search strategy can be provided on request). The 448 articles identified were screened electronically by title or abstract for a list of key words similar to subject headings to include only articles with a strong focus upon older adults' PPSM. These remaining 227 article abstracts were reviewed (Stewart and Schofield, coauthors), and inclusion and exclusion criteria applied. Our inclusion criteria were that the article must focus on non-malignant musculoskeletal PPSM, exclusively refer to or involve older adults (aged 65 years+) and be published in English.

Musculoskeletal pain represents the majority of pain disorders affecting older adults. The treatment of other pain types, such as rheumatoid arthritis or neuropathic pain, are likely to differ from musculoskeletal pain [4], and so were excluded. To clarify assumptions, a basic definition for PPSM was devised: Any action or activity taken alone, or in combination, by an individual to control pain and/or reduce the impact of pain upon daily life which can be taught by another person (i.e., health care professional, complementary or alternative therapist, lay person/peer) or self-learned, that has a reasonable scientific basis for use and is reasonably accessible to the general public.

There were no restrictions on study designs; however, opinion pieces and editorials were excluded. Failure to meet age criteria was the most common reason for exclusion. Two articles (not meeting age criteria) were included in our final sample as the authors were key experts in the field of self-management. The articles included older adults even though they were not exclusively about them, and the articles did not differ in PPSM understanding from others being included. The reference lists of academic articles (N = 38) were reviewed for any missing relevant articles.

Grey literature (literature available outside academic publishing domains) searches were conducted of materials published by patient, professional, and government agencies. Articles considered relevant to this analysis were included (N = 7) and consisted of organizational guidelines, professional education documents, and patient education leaflets.

The minimum data set for concept analysis is 30 articles or 20% of the population of relevant articles [21]. Consequently, all 45 articles were included in the final analysis [2,13,33–75].

Data Collection

Articles were retrieved, and a standardized data extraction tool, with clearly defined conceptual components (i.e., attributes, referents, antecedents, consequences) was used by one reviewer (Stewart, co-author). A second reviewer (Schofield, co-author) checked a 10% sample. Few disagreements occurred; discussion between reviewers resolved disagreements. Data were transferred to Microsoft Excel spreadsheets (Microsoft Corporation, Redmond, WA, USA) for analysis.

Data Analysis

Grounded theory that aims to provide an overview of the phenomenon, seek relationships between themes, and provide insights that can develop or refine theory was applied [76]. Using a thematic analysis framework [77], a coding list was developed to capture data under each conceptual component. Emerging themes for each component were noted and organized into categories. Analyses between primary author disciplines (i.e., nursing, psychology) were conducted unblinded. No differences between disciplines emerged, and all articles were combined for the final analysis. A random sample (N = 18, 40%) was reviewed for emerging themes by Schofield, Elliott, and Torrance (coauthors). The theoretical definition was then constructed from the final themes and their relationships to one another, as identified, in the analysis. All reviewers discussed and agreed upon the final results.


Articles from nursing (N = 14) and psychology (N = 14) predominated. Remaining articles were represented by disciplines such as allied health (i.e., physiotherapists) and geriatricians. Table lists all included articles, the PPSM term used, and the target pain condition. Less than half (N = 20) of included articles provided an explicit definition. The terms “self-care” and “self-help” were identified as surrogate terms used in place of self-management. Pain coping and health education emerged as related concepts, subtly integrated among the attributes of PPSM. From an evolutionary perspective, older adults' PPSM appeared a relatively new concept; the earliest article was published in 1992, but the majority were published from 2006 to 2011 (N = 26).

View this table:
Table 1

Articles included within the analysis of the concept older adults' persistent pain self-management (N = 45)

Reference (Name)Term UsedPain Type
Baird and Sands (2004) [35]Self-managementArthritis
Barlow et al. (2009) [36]Self-managementArthritis
Barlow, Williams and Wright (1997) [37]Self-managementArthritis
Barry et al. (2004) [38]Pain copingChronic pain
Berman et al. (2009) [39]Self-careChronic pain
Blyth et al. (2005) [40]Self-managementChronic pain
Davis (1992) [41]Self-managementChronic pain
Dunn and Horgas (2004) [42]Pain copingChronic pain
Ehrlich-Jones (2001) [43]Self-careChronic pain
Ersek et al. (2008) [33]Self-managementChronic pain
Green et al. (2009) [44]Pain copingChronic pain
Haas et al. (2005) [34]Self-managementLow back pain
Hadjistavropoulos and Shymkiw (2007) [45]Self-managementChronic pain
Hopman-Rock et al. (1998) [46]Pain copingArthritis
Krein et al. (2007) [47]Self-managementChronic pain
Kroenke et al. (2009) [48]Self-managementChronic pain
Lachapelle and Hadjistravropoulos (2005) [49]Pain copingChronic pain
Laforest et al. (2008) [50]Self-managementArthritis
Lansbury (2000) [51]Pain copingChronic pain
Lohmann et al. (1998) [52]Pain copingChronic pain
Lorig, Ritter and Plant (2005) [53]Self-managementArthritis
McCracken, Vowles and Gauntlett-Gilbert (2007) [54]Pain copingChronic pain
McDonald-Miszczak and Wister (2005) [55]Self-careArthritis
Mendelson, McCullough and Cahn (2011) [56]Self-managementArthritis
Morone et al. (2008) [57]Pain copingChronic pain
Newman (2001) [58]Self-helpArthritis
Nour et al. (2007) [59]Self-managementArthritis
Rapp et al. (2000) [60]Pain copingArthritis
Reid et al. (2008) [13]Self-managementChronic pain
Roberto and Reynolds (2002) [61]Self-careChronic pain
Robinson (1999) [62]Self-careChronic pain
Ross et al. (2001) [63]Self-careChronic pain
Seomun et al. (2006) [64]Pain copingArthritis
Tak (2006) [65]Pain copingArthritis
Townley et al. (2010) [66]Self-managementBack pain
Tsai, Liu and Chung (2010) [67]Self-careChronic pain
Turner, Ersek and Kemp (2005) [68]Pain copingChronic pain
Yang (2006) [69]Self-managementChronic pain
American Geriatric Society (2002) [3]APPChronic pain
British Geriatrics Society (2010) [70]Self-managementAny LTC
British Pain Society (2007) [71]PMPChronic pain
Department of Health (2006) [72]Self-managementChronic pain
National Health Service (2008) [73]Self-helpChronic pain
NHS QIS (2006) [74]Self-managementChronic pain
NICE (2008) [75]Self-managementArthritis
  • APP = active patient participation; LTC = long-term condition; PMP = pain management program; NHS = National Health Service; NHS QIS = National Health Service Quality Improvement Scotland; NICE = National Institute for Clinical Excellence.

Referents, Antecedents, and Consequences

Analysis of referents (contextual information) resulted in the identification of three situations where older adults' PPSM occurs: first, as an intervention to teach self-management skills; second, as everyday patient behaviors; and third, as an outcome. Older adults' PPSM was expected to occur on a regular basis, and although older adults were at the center of PPSM, the involvement of others, such as care providers, family, and friends, was also a common theme. However, little agreement as to the boundaries of the roles of others made it difficult to disentangle the roles of formal and informal health care. Three antecedents were identified: the individual's awareness of the need to self-manage pain, the individual's willingness and ability to engage with PPSM, and the availability of external support. Numerous consequences of PPSM spanning the physical, psychological, and social health domains were identified (Table ). We found no standard instrument to measure the occurrence or consequences of PPSM.

View this table:
Table 2

Examples of identified outcomes associated with older adults' persistent pain self-management and their respective measurement tools

DomainOutcomesMeasures Used
Physical health and functionPain (intensity, severity, interference, location)Arthritis impact measures (AIMS2)
FatigueHealth assessment questionnaire (HAQ)
StiffnessBrief pain inventory (BPI)
MobilityRoland–Morris disability questionnaire (RDQ)
DisabilityShort Form-36 (SF36)
General health and wellbeing
Psychological health and functionAnxiety and depressionArthritis self-efficacy scale
Self-efficacyHospital anxiety and depression scale (HADS)
Cognitive functionPositive and negative affect scale (PANAS)
Locus of controlPain self-efficacy questionnaire (PSEQ)
Arthritis helplessness index (AHI)
Geriatric depression scale (GDS)
Pain beliefs questionnaire (PBQ)
Pain stages of change questionnaire (PSOCQ)
Social functionSocial wellbeing/functionSocial support survey
Quality of lifeHealth-related quality of life
Use of pain self-management techniquesPharmacologic: over the counter and prescribed medicinesStanford arthritis scale
RelaxationSelf-care behavior inventory
ExerciseChronic pain coping inventory
Social contactCoping strategies questionnaire
Cognitive symptom managementWays of coping questionnaire
Stress managementSelf-management behavior questionnaire
Community/health education/support groupPain management inventory
OtherUse of health care resources (i.e., GP visits) goal attainmentSelf-report or medical records goal attainment scaling
  • This table provides a summary of the most frequently occurring outcomes and measurement tools and does not list each outcome and measurement tool identified in this analysis. GP = General Practitioner.

Theoretical Context

Theories associated with older adults' PPSM focused on either explaining older adults' engagement with PPSM or the pathway between PPSM and health improvement. Most were of psychological origin and included the theory of self-efficacy [13,33,34,36,37,41,47,48,50,58,63,64,68,75], the transactional model of stress and coping [49], and the health beliefs model [55,56,62]. Increasing self-efficacy, the confidence to manage pain [68] was commonly considered to be highly important to increasing older adults' participation with PPSM. Less attention was given toward explaining how PPSM leads to health improvement. There was overlap between mediating and outcome variables; choice of pain management behaviors were considered to mediate the relationship between pain and PPSM health outcomes [68], but pain management behaviors were also considered as outcomes of PPSM [62].


Five attributes of older adults' PPSM were identified: multidimensional process, active individuals, personal development, response to symptoms, and symptom control. Each attribute is presented below, followed by consideration of the concepts unique relevance to older adults.

Multidimensional Process

Older adult's PPSM is complex, involving multiple events and features, as illustrated by Figure and through the range of identified pain management skills, behaviors, and actions (Table ). The complexities of PPSM can be further demonstrated through the common assumptions that PPSM has multiple functions: to engage older adults with pain management, to inform and support older adults pain management, to improve health and well-being, and to improve use of health care resources.

The aims of pain management programmes are to: improve people's understanding of chronic pain and the relationship between pain, emotion and behaviour, improve people's level of physical, social, practical and emotional functioning and confidence, reduce fear of movement, provide coping strategies for dealing with their disability and distress, promote autonomy and independence, reduce or modify the person's future use of healthcare. ([74], p. 15)

Figure 1

Diagram illustrating the antecedents, attributes, and consequences of older adults' self-management of persistent pain.

View this table:
Table 3

The range of skills, actions, activities, and behaviors associated with older adults' persistent pain self-management

General skills taught or required for the self-management of pain
Learning about pain
Practice and experience of skills and behaviors
Self-confidence in own ability to manage pain
Communication skills
Problem solving and decision making
Planning and goal setting
Evaluating and monitoring
Pain management behaviors, activities, and strategies
Tai chi
Thermal treatments
Analgesic medications
Complementary therapies
Managing general health (i.e., optimizing diet)
Pacing and prioritizing activities
Keeping busy and persevering
Relaxation/breathing exercises
Cognitive behavioral therapy
Religious activities (i.e., prayer)
Cognitive management (i.e., distraction, positive self-statements)
Seeking/using professional support/advice
Support in the community (i.e., self-help groups)
Seeking/using social support (i.e., family, friends)

PPSM is also a process; it develops over time and aims to achieve improvement across multiple health domains (Table ).

Active Individuals

This attribute reflects the central role played by individuals in the everyday decisions and actions taken to manage persistent pain and pain-associated symptoms. When describing this role, commonly applied descriptives emerged: “to be empowered …” ([70], p. 3) and “to take responsibility. … and maintain their independence.” ([69], p. 232). It was often anticipated that as part of being an active individual, older adults would have, or build, collaborative relationships with care professionals.

[f]ive core self-management skills: problem-solving, decision-making, resource utilization, formation of a patient-provider partnership, and adoption of actions to manage the health condition. ([33], p. 30)

It was also apparent that self-awareness was important. To be active individuals, older adults needed to be aware of pain beliefs, motivations toward managing pain, and negative thoughts toward pain.

Personal Development

Personal development reflects the commonly agreed need to learn, evaluate, and build upon personal resources and skills. The focus upon personal action plans and the setting of personal targets reflects a common assumption that PPSM is individualized. Health education was related to personal development through the expectation that health professionals should provide patients with information “by giving them information relevant to the advanced stages of arthritis” ([50], p. 541). Developing knowledge and skills, alongside the need to evaluate their own progress (Table ) suggests that individuals should take ownership and responsibility for enhancing their abilities to self-manage persistent pain.

Response to Symptoms

Response to symptoms describes individuals' cognitive or emotional reactions to pain and pain-associated symptoms. Cognitive behavioral therapy was frequently cited as one method of addressing an individual's symptom response.

[c]ognitive-behavioral treatments for chronic pain are based on the idea that altering an individual's responses to their condition can reduce disability and suffering ([54], p. 339)

A relationship with pain coping emerged from discussions regarding the importance of “active coping,” i.e., having positive beliefs and responses to pain. The importance of this attribute was stressed: “an individual's choice of coping strategies will determine their adjustment to chronic pain” ([54], p. 339). However, contradiction exists as to what are, and are not, active coping strategies. One definition states that: Active coping strategies were defined as including any instrumental activity initiated by the person in pain to deal with his/her pain, but only if not characterised by avoidance or escape ([40], p. 287)

Blyth et al. classified “mental distraction” as an active coping behavior [40]. However, Lachapelle and Hadjistavropoulos depicted distraction techniques to be avoidance oriented [49] stating that avoidance actions are not active-coping strategies.

Symptom Control

This attribute describes the relationship between the broad ranges of symptom control activities (Table ) and expected outcomes of PPSM (Table ).

By using these techniques and making them part of your daily routine, we hope you will be able to manage your pain better, making life more enjoyable and rewarding; It's all about giving you some control back, rather than letting the pain take over. [73]

As shown in Table , PPSM does not focus upon pain control exclusively but also includes controlling pain interference with general health and daily activities. Reducing pain was not always considered the most important outcome; reduced physical impairment and psychological distress were often considered to be as, or more, important. Therefore, symptom control relates to the control of pain and also wider impacts of living with pain as perceived by the older adult.

Reference Toward Older Adults

Few articles expressed consideration of how PPSM applies specifically toward older adults or how older adults' PPSM may differ from younger adults. One study suggests older adults may have different expectations regarding the efficacy of PPSM strategies [38]. Older adults' responses to pain may differ on account of experiencing different stresses from younger adults [49]. There may be wider benefits to older adults learning to self-manage pain such as increased ability to cope with other sources of stress encountered in daily life [36]. One study's findings suggested that older adults particularly value social contact from group self-management activities [33]. Additionally, comorbidities [55] and restricted abilities to participate in PPSM activities [49] were suggested as potential barriers unique to older adults.

Theoretical Definition

Based upon the identified antecedents, attributes, and consequences, our proposed theoretical definition for older adults' PPSM follows: A multidimensional process occurring when an older adult perceives the need to self-manage pain and is willing and able to do so with support from others. It involves an older adult with persistent pain being an active individual in their treatment, engaged in the personal development of skills and being aware of their own responses to symptoms. The older adult initiates, participates, and develops their own methods of symptom control by using pain management techniques that lead to improvements in the physical, psychological, and social health domains.


Limited literature, focused predominantly in the last decade, indicates the novelty of PPSM within the context of older adults. Older adults' PPSM was identified as a multidimensional process composed of many components sharing commonality across disciplines: active individuals, personal development, response to symptoms, and symptom control. However, lack of clarity surrounding its theoretical framework and little detail regarding PPSM within the context of later life have implications for the theoretical definition and the use of this concept. For example, if older adults' expectations of PPSM differ from younger adults, then how will this impact upon personal development as influenced by older adults' unique treatment goals and priorities. Nonetheless, the analysis of the concept of PPSM in relation to older adults allows us and others to better focus our research efforts and identify important clinical considerations in the support of older adults' PPSM.

A collaborative relationship between providers and patients appeared important. Our analysis suggests this should involve providers giving pain information and supporting patients' treatment choices. However, older adults vary in how much involvement they want to have in treatment decisions; some older adults prefer providers to make all treatment decisions [78]. Furthermore, some patients are perceived by providers to be unable to participate in decision making, and providers report that this and time constraints pose barriers to shared decision making [79]. In addition, older adults with multimorbidity can present further difficulties, specifically, the need to prioritize conditions and manage opposing treatments [80]. Patients with multiple morbidities can find performing self-management more difficult and burdensome [80] and thus needing increased provider guidance and support. While providers have an important role, they are presented with many challenges in supporting older adults' PPSM. The literature rarely considered older adults' PPSM within the background of other chronic illnesses and provides little indications as to how providers can support the self-management of multiple long-term conditions. Further research is critically needed in this more complicated context of older adults' PPSM so that providers can be better advised as to how they can enhance older adults' PPSM.

In view of the numerous theories, mediating variables, and outcome measures identified, we propose that the overall theoretical framework for older adults' PPSM requires clarification. Theory analysis examines theoretical components and the relationships between them, providing a clear basis for future research and practice [81]. We also suggest a need to consider how best to measure PPSM; as PPSM has been identified as a multidimensional process, one-dimensional assessment tools measuring selected attributes would not be adequate. However, clarification of theories and measures will require that one important gap be addressed: the need to explore the perspectives and experiences of older adults and health professionals. This exploration will allow us to refine the attributes, providing a clearer understanding of how to identify the concept. Considering the evolutionary nature of concepts [21] and that the cohort of older adults will change over time, we must also consider the impact of change among future research. “Today's generation” of older adults may differ from future generations, and it is imperative to explore this to avoid working with an outdated and ill-informed concept of PPSM.

Our findings are subject to some limitations. Despite a comprehensive search strategy, only a relatively small number of publications were found, which may not have been large enough to detect differences between disciplines. The few explicit definitions of PPSM available resulted in our need to incorporate implied understandings. As secondary analysis of a random sample of the literature was conducted, we cannot rule out the possibility of researcher bias, although we did clarify prior assumptions by agreeing on a basic definition for older adults' PPSM before embarking on this investigation. Absent boundaries surrounding PPSM, particularly in relation to symptom control activities, present a further limitation; a strategy perceived by older adults to be helpful in terms of pain control may be health harming in the eyes of the health professional. The absence of age-specific considerations within the theoretical definition, although reflective of the literature examined, does leave us with a definition that could be applicable to all ages. We do however consider this to be an important finding in itself; that those applying the concept of PPSM to older adults often do not consider how its meaning may change in later life. Therefore, our results provide a starting point and form the first of a series of studies exploring the concept of older adults' PPSM. Our ongoing research, exploring the perspectives of older adults and health care professionals toward PPSM, aims to address some of the limitations and unanswered questions this analysis has uncovered. We also suggest that research utilizing a form of the Delphi technique would be beneficial in obtaining consensus opinion among relevant stakeholders regarding the meaning of older adults' PPSM.


Our findings have clarified what is currently known and agreed upon regarding the concept of older adults' PPSM, providing a guide for further development and use of this concept. A refinement of the PPSM attributes is warranted with consideration of the unique and complex needs of older adults. Further research is needed to determine strategies that will help providers overcome barriers to their key support of the process of older adults' PPSM. Finally, clarification of the theoretical framework surrounding older adults' PPSM will greatly enhance our understanding and utility of the concept, older adults' PPSM.


  • Disclosure: This research was conducted as part of the primary authors' doctoral (PhD) studies and funded by the College of Life Sciences, University of Aberdeen, UK.

  • Conflict of Interest: None

  • Coauthors and Contributions

    View this table:


View Abstract